Matthew Henry
Here is,
Did you offer unto me sacrifices and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel? It is implied, “No, you did not.” But, whether the course of sacrifices had been interrupted or no, God saw fit now to repeat the law of sacrifices,
Inter arma silent leges—law is little regarded amidst the clash of arms. No, says God,
my bread for my sacrificeseven now
shall you observe to offer, and that
in the due season. They were peculiarly concerned to keep their peace with God when they were at war with their enemies. In the wilderness they were solitary, and quite separate from all other people, and therefore there they needed not so much their distinguishing badges, nor would their omission of sacrifices be so scandalous as when they came into Canaan, when they mingled with other people.
observe God’s statutes, Ps 105:44, Ps 105:45.
continual burnt-offering(Num 28:3), which intimates that when we are bidden to
pray always, and to pray without ceasing, it is intended that at least every morning and every evening we offer up our solemn prayers and praises to God. This is said to be
ordained in Mount Sinai(Num 28:6), when the other laws were given. The institution of it we have, Exod 29:38. Nothing is here added in the repetition of the law, but that the wine to be poured out in the drink-offering is ordered to be
strong wine(Num 28:7), the riches and most generous and best-bodied wine they could get. Though it was to be poured out upon the altar, and not drunk (they therefore might be ready to think the worst would serve to be so thrown away), yet God requires the strongest, to teach us to serve God with the best we have. The wine must be strong (says Ainsworth) because it was a figure of the blood of Christ, the memorial of which is still left to the church in wine, and of the blood of the martyrs, which was poured out as a drink-offering upon the
sacrifice and service of our faith, Phil 2:17.